<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Creative DC Profile: Kimberly Wilson</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.creativedc.org/2006/05/creative-dc-profile-kimberly-wilson/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.creativedc.org/2006/05/creative-dc-profile-kimberly-wilson/</link>
	<description>Showcasing and inspiring creative living in Washington, DC</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 21:47:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Scenic Artisan</title>
		<link>http://www.creativedc.org/2006/05/creative-dc-profile-kimberly-wilson/comment-page-1/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Scenic Artisan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 16:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.creativedc.org/?p=10#comment-19</guid>
		<description>I guess either. But how do you think of it.&lt;br/&gt;Coming from the viewpoint of a maker of things, i tend to think of the term &quot;create&quot; as having a physical product afterward. whereas being innovative, or ingenius or inspiring may be more internal, or at least not tangible.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;ie, can you &quot;create&quot; an idea? or do you &quot;think&quot; an idea? but my thoughts are just semantics really, and so i wonder how you feel about it.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I definitley like the direction you have set up for yourself with this blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess either. But how do you think of it.<br />Coming from the viewpoint of a maker of things, i tend to think of the term &#8220;create&#8221; as having a physical product afterward. whereas being innovative, or ingenius or inspiring may be more internal, or at least not tangible.</p>
<p>ie, can you &#8220;create&#8221; an idea? or do you &#8220;think&#8221; an idea? but my thoughts are just semantics really, and so i wonder how you feel about it.</p>
<p>I definitley like the direction you have set up for yourself with this blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda</title>
		<link>http://www.creativedc.org/2006/05/creative-dc-profile-kimberly-wilson/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 22:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.creativedc.org/?p=10#comment-17</guid>
		<description>Is that question for me, or for Kimberly?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is that question for me, or for Kimberly?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scenic Artisan</title>
		<link>http://www.creativedc.org/2006/05/creative-dc-profile-kimberly-wilson/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Scenic Artisan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 19:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.creativedc.org/?p=10#comment-15</guid>
		<description>how do you think of &quot;creativity&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how do you think of &#8220;creativity&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
